Powered By Blogger

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Otherness

In class we have been talking a lot about how characters from our books are isolated and ultimately stand alone from the rest of society. Characters like Emily from “A Rose for Emily”, Bartleby from “Bartleby the Scrivner” and Victor from “Because My Father…” all share common identities of being alone in their own way. Trying to apply these characters from class to outside literature, I made the connection that Frodo from "The Lord of the Rings" has a lot in common with the characters from class. Frodo is isolated from the rest of the fellowship when he is bestowed ring bearer. Although he is not physically alone most of the time (mostly accompanied by Samwise Gamgee, Gollum or the rest of the fellowship) he does isolate himself in the way that only he thinks he's the only person who can destroy the one ring. This ultimately turns Frodo into a greedy, selfish individual that turns on his friend Sam. Mr. Gamgee could be compared to Latika in Slumdog Millionaire. Latika is separated from Salim and Jamal, but is still present in the mind of Jamal throughout the movie and is his grounding example of what the past was once like. She, much like Sam does to Frodo, gives Jamal hope during dark times. Sam and Latika are two individuals that ground and connect the “others” back into solidarity and companionship.

4 comments:

  1. I like how you identified that every "other" needs somebody to keep them connected to reality. This got me thinking as to what happens when there is nobody to connect them, and I instantly thought of Bartleby. He was truly alone, and even though the narrator tried to break into his past and therefore secure his future, he was never able to. The result was that he was lost to everyone around him as well as to himself. He had no reason to go on and he soon passed on.
    Emily too had no one to connect her to reality. The only one who might have been able to do that was Homer, but that obviously didn't work out very well. In the end, she too was eternally lost.

    ReplyDelete
  2. While Bartleby the Scrivener to Lord of the Rings is an obvious comparison, I suppose I can comment.

    But in all seriousness, Frodo/Sam is a fitting comparison to Jamal/Latika. Frodo and Jamal both wouldn't be able to pursue their ultimate goal without the presence of their companion (for Frodo, Sam is instrumental in destroying the ring, and for Jamal, Latika literally is the goal).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah well his post is alright when dealing with content, and you made a good connection with the epic trilogy that is Lord of the Rings. But from all your connections from Slumdog Millionaire and LOTR, i think that a more appropiate character would be Suaron. He is the ultimate badass who is even more alone than Frodo. Sauron is an orb of pure evil who will kill those around him who gets in his way. So in a way Sauron is more alon than Frodo because Frodo has much support from his fellowship and the rest of Middle Earth while Saruon has mere pawns to get him closer to his ultimate goal.

    ReplyDelete
  4. wow great connection. I like how you linked the books to the lord of the rings, very creative and open minded.

    ReplyDelete